Between Two Names: Part 1
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Between Two Names: Jesus Barabbas and Jesus Christ
Part 1 — A Reflection on Textual Nuance and Spiritual Choice
Scriptures like 2 Samuel 21:1–9 can be misleading if not read carefully. The mention of two Mephibosheths, distinguished only by their parentage, can easily lead to confusion. One might think there's only one Mephibosheth, but careful attention to the text reveals the distinction.
Upon close reading, the passage clearly distinguishes between two Mephibosheths:
- One is the son of Jonathan, grandson of Saul (2 Samuel 21:7).
- The other is the son of Rizpah, Saul's concubine, and half-brother to Jonathan (2 Samuel 21:8–9).
The context and genealogy provided in the passage make it evident that these are two distinct individuals with different parentage, avoiding any potential confusion when read carefully.
The Paradox of Two Jesuses
This reminds me of the biblical account of Barabbas, who was released from crucifixion instead of Jesus Christ. Interestingly, Barabbas’ full name might have been “Jesus Barabbas”, meaning “Jesus, son of the father” or “Jesus, son of Abbas.” In some ancient manuscripts of Matthew 27:16–17, this longer name is indeed used.
The similarity between the two Jesuses raises intriguing questions. In the context of the biblical narrative, the focus was on the choice between two individuals, rather than the specifics of their names. The question posed to the crowd, Which one should be released, Jesus Barabbas or Jesus called Christ?
, highlights the irony of two individuals sharing a similar name yet having vastly different fates.
“Who should die for you — Jesus Barabbas or Jesus Christ?”
This question challenges us even today: Which Jesus do we choose — the one who satisfies our pride or the one who saves our souls?
Just as the distinction between the two Mephibosheths lies in their parentage, the distinction between Jesus Barabbas and Jesus Christ lies in their identities and purposes. Careful attention to the biblical text can help us appreciate these nuances and gain a deeper understanding of the narratives.
The Importance of Textual Nuance
Scripture can sometimes lose its original impact due to subtle differences in punctuation, wording, or omissions. A small change can significantly alter the meaning, as illustrated by these two statements:
- “I promise you today, you’ll be with me in Paradise.”
- “I promise you, today you’ll be with me in Paradise.”
Though they share the same words, the placement of the comma changes the meaning entirely. Similarly, the inclusion or omission of the word “Jesus” before “Barabbas” can shift the interpretation of a passage and its theological depth.
This highlights the importance of careful translation, interpretation, and attention to detail when working with ancient texts. The nuances of language can significantly impact our understanding of the message, and small differences can lead to distinct interpretations.
Translation vs Transliteration
The name “Jesus” is a transliteration of the Greek Iēsous, which itself translates the Hebrew Yeshua. The shift from one language to another can subtly change meaning. While translation conveys meaning, transliteration preserves pronunciation and identity. Both serve vital but distinct purposes in preserving biblical authenticity.
The Choice Before Us
And so, in light of Pilate's question, we are confronted with a profound choice between Jesus Barabbas and Jesus Christ. This decision forces us to consider: which Jesus will we choose? The one who saves our pride or the one who saves our souls?
The choice between Jesus Barabbas and Jesus Christ symbolizes the eternal decision between worldly gain and spiritual redemption.
Deuteronomy 30:19 emphasizes choosing life over death, blessing over curse. Likewise, the inclusion of “Jesus” in Barabbas’ name heightens the gravity of the decision — making us aware that even subtle details can shape eternal perspectives.
Ultimately, this story invites us to reflect deeply: when presented with two names that sound alike, which one truly saves?
Conclusion Part 1
Ultimately, leaving out the name Jesus when referring to Barabbas skews our understanding of the pivotal choice presented by Pilate — a choice between him and Jesus called Christ remains uneven and uninformed. But framing it as a choice between two Jesuses shifts our perspective; our minds expand, revealing the profound weight of Pilate's question. It lands with urgency, inviting introspection about life and death stakes within us. The query resonates: Which Jesus do we align with? Who is the Jesus we truly want?
Naming both figures as Jesuses — Jesus Barabbas and Jesus called Christ — heightens the contrast, illuminating the crux of the decision. It becomes personal, stirring reflection on what each represents and what our choice signifies. The juxtaposition ignites contemplation about identity, intent, and the resonance of Christ's message versus the other.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments
Post a Comment