Tateguru (Jaison Ndlovu)

Pilate’s Inscription: A Mockery of the Jews, Not of Jesus Pilate’s Inscription: A Mockery of the Jews, Not of Jesus Pilate’s action of inscribing “INRI” (Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum – Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews) on the cross, as recorded in John 19:19–20 , was not a mere Roman custom nor a mockery of Jesus Himself. It was a calculated act — a direct mockery of the Jewish leaders who demanded His crucifixion. Pilate, warned through his wife’s dream (Matthew 27:19), had been made aware that Jesus was not an ordinary prisoner. He recognized an air of innocence and divinity around Him, enough to make him cautious. Several times he declared, “I find no fault in Him,” and sought to release Him, but the religious elite insisted on His death. When Pilate finally gave in to the mounting pressure, he symbolically washed his hands before the crowd, declaring his innocence in the matter (Matthew 27:24). The act signified his refusal to bear responsibility for condemni...

In the Name of Jesus In the Name of Jesus When Christians affirm "no other name in whom we can be saved but the name of Jesus," they are typically referring to "the name of Jesus" — a phrase that signifies the profound importance of Jesus Christ's identity, role, and authority in salvation. Rooted in biblical passages like Acts 4:12 (NIV), which declares, "Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to mankind by which we must be saved," this expression encapsulates the essence of Jesus' person, His redemptive work, and divine nature. It transcends the mere utterance of the word "Jesus"; rather, "the name of Jesus" embodies His sacrifice, resurrection, and mediatorial role central to Christian faith. In contrast, isolating "the name JESUS" might emphasize the literal word itself. Christians invoke "the name of Jesus" in contexts of praye...

The Branch and the Root: The Fulfillment of All Shadows — Part 3 The Branch and the Root: The Fulfillment of All Shadows Part 3 — Concluding Synthesis: Yeshua, Yehoshua, and the Eternal Priest-King Series: Between Two Names — Part 3 (Final) The prophetic symbolism of the Branch, woven through Zechariah and Isaiah and realized in the New Testament, finds its consummation in Yeshua HaMashiach — the Root and the Branch, the eternal High Priest and King. This final part draws together the threads of name, typology, and prophecy to show how ancient shadows climactically meet their fulfillment in Christ. Joshua as Shadow; Yeshua as Substance In Zechariah 3 the figure of Joshua (Yehoshua) stands as an emblem of the earthly priesthood — a human office marked by ritual, need, and impurity. The prophetic scene reveals Joshua accused, cleansed, and clothed, a typological act pointing to what is to come. The earthly priesthood could ...

The Branch from the Roots of Jesse — Part 2 The Branch from the Roots of Jesse Part 2 — Yeshua, Yehoshua, and the Eternal Priesthood Series: Between Two Names — Part 2 While Jesus (Yeshua ישוע) and Joshua (יהושע Yehoshua) share related meanings—both expressing “God is salvation”—they reflect subtle linguistic evolution between Hebrew and Aramaic forms. Yeshua is a shortened form of Yehoshua , yet both stem from the same salvific root and convey the same divine promise. In biblical contexts: Yehoshua (Joshua) appears in the Old Testament, most notably as Joshua son of Jehozadak, the High Priest. Yeshua designates Jesus Christ , the ultimate High Priest of the New Covenant. Despite their shared essence, these names serve distinct narrative roles. Recognizing this clarifies identity and continuity: otherwise, the name is one . The Deeper Meaning in Zechariah 3 If both Joshua...

Between Two Names: Jesus Barabbas and Jesus Christ — Part 1 Between Two Names: Jesus Barabbas and Jesus Christ Part 1 — A Reflection on Textual Nuance and Spiritual Choice Series: Between Two Names — Part 1 Scriptures like 2 Samuel 21:1–9 can be misleading if not read carefully. The mention of two Mephibosheths, distinguished only by their parentage, can easily lead to confusion. One might think there's only one Mephibosheth, but careful attention to the text reveals the distinction. Upon close reading, the passage clearly distinguishes between two Mephibosheths: One is the son of Jonathan, grandson of Saul ( 2 Samuel 21:7 ). The other is the son of Rizpah, Saul's concubine, and half-brother to Jonathan ( 2 Samuel 21:8–9 ). The context and genealogy provided in the passage make it evident that these are two distinct individuals with different parentage, avoiding any poten...